Evaluation of Achievements of National Educational Standards Policy at Primary Schools in Parigi Moutong District
Main Article Content
Rizal
Djuraid
Daswati
This research focuses on investigations regarding the non-attainment of National Education Standards in Parigi Moutong Regency Elementary Schools. Qualitative methods are used to describe holistic education policy evaluations. In this research, the validity of the data was strengthened through various techniques such as extended participation, careful observation, triangulation, peer checking, and case analysis. The equipment used by researchers includes interview guidelines, observation guidelines, and document recording. The CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model is the main basis for evaluating education policies. This model is comprehensive and can be applied to policy aspects, from curriculum to institutional policy. The evaluation results show that the achievement of National Education Standards at Parigi Moutong Regency Elementary School is still not optimal. Factors such as community participation, limited facilities, low teacher innovation, and school principal management that is not yet optimal are the main obstacles. Learning processes that are less innovative and weak management of school principals are also a concern. Educational products, such as low AKM results and the lack of development of information technology and an independent learning curriculum, are important highlights in assessing the quality of graduates and human resources for teaching staff.
Abidin. (2006). Desain Pendidikan Abad 21. Jakarta: DEPDIKNAS.
Ali, M. N. (2010). Telaah tentang kebijakan ujian nasional dan kinerja sistem pendidikan nasional. Academica, 2(1), 263–272.
Anderson, J. (1969). Public Policy Making: An Introduction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Ahsin1, Ernawati2, Maman A Majid Binfas. (2021). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 Di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Negeri Tugu Selatan 03 Jakarta Utara. Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof DR HAMKA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan (JPPP).
Badjuri, A., & Yuwono, T. (2002). Kebijakan Publik Konsep dan Strategi. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Bungin, B. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media.
Dunn, W. N. (2003). Kebijakan Publik dan Pengambilan Keputusan. Yogyakarta: TP.
Dwiyanto. (2012). Good Governance: Kepemrintahan Yang Baik & Good Corporate Governance. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.
Dye. (1981). Understanding Public Policy. New Jersey: Engleewood Cliffs.
Esti Wahyu Kurniawati. (2021). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Perspektif Model Cipp (Context, Input, Process, Product). GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1). [DOI]
Fredericson. (2004). Psychological Resilience. New York: McCullough.
Greston. (2002). Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Hasbullah, H. M. (2014). Kebijakan Pendidikan: Dalam Perspektif Teori, Aplikasi, dan Kondisi Objektif Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: P.T. Grafindo Persada.
Howlett, & Ramesh. (1995). Studying Public Policy Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems. New Jersey, Ohio: Oxpord University Press.
Husaini, U. (2013). Manajemen Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan (Bumi Aksara). Jakarta.
Husaini, Usman. (2006). Manajemen Teori, Praktek Dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Indonesia. (2000). Undang-undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2000 tentang Program Pembangunan Nasional (PROPENAS).
Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Indonesia. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun Standar Pendidikan Nasional (SNP).
Jateng, P. (2008). Peraturan Wali Kota Semarang Nomor 6 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem dan Tata Cara Penerimaan Peserta Didik di Kota Semarang. Semarang.
Kartono, K. (1997). Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha.
Latief, J. A., Amrullah, & Awalunisah, S. (2019). Kebijakan Pemerintah Sulawesi Tengah Terhadap Pembangunan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Bomba Jurnal Pembanguna Daerah, 1(1), 1–6.
Lester, & Steward. (2000). Public Policy An Evolutionary Approach. New York: Bushberg.
Marshall. (2004). Participation in Decision Making; a Matter of Context. Boston: Emerald Group.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.
Nurkolis. (2003). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah, Teori, Model dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Oktavia, J., Berlian, Y., & Saragih, A. (2018). Peran Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Perkembangan Mutu Pendidikan di Daerah. Diakses pada 6 Januari 2020, dari ResearchGate: [link]
Parsons. (2008). Public Policy: An Introduction To The Theory And Practice of Policy. Jakarta: Kencana.
asminto, R., & Khausar, K. (2018). Evaluasi Implementasi Kebijakan Zonasi Pertanian Di Kabupaten Bekasi. Genta Mulia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 10(1), 8–22. Retrieved from http://www.ejournal.stkipbbm.ac.id/index.php/gm/article/view/140/128
Robbins, S. P. (2004). Personal Manajemen. New York: Prentice Hall.
Senduk, J. (2006). Isu dan Kebijakan Pendidikan, Konsep dan Aplikasinya. Manado: Universitas negeri manado.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. 2003 Annual Conference of the Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2005). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31–62). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16
Syafaruddin. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Tangkilisan, H. N. S. (2003). Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Balairung.
Thoha. (2011). Etika Publik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wahab. (1998). Analisis Kebijakan dari Formula Keimplementasian Kebijakan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Winter. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capability. Philadelphia: The Wharton School.
Rizal, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
Doctoral Social Sciences, Postgraduate, Tadulako University
Djuraid, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
Doctoral Social Sciences, Postgraduate, Tadulako University
Daswati, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
Doctoral Social Sciences, Postgraduate, Tadulako University
